Jan Timmermann
· 18.10.2023
In this article, we use so-called affiliate links. With every purchase through these links, we receive a commission from the merchant. All relevant referral links are marked with . Learn more.
When buying a mountain bike, there is almost no question that burns hotter than the question of value for money. We all want to get a good product for our money. In most cases, the decision in favour of or against a particular bike is only made after looking into the wallet. Prices are easy to compare.
It is more difficult to determine what an MTB can do. Individual aspects always play a role here: What do I want to do with the bike? Does a bike also pick me up emotionally?
Fortunately, we at BIKE have a long-established Test systemwhich analyses all objectifiable factors of a mountain bike's performance in a detailed scoring system.
In addition to the practical impression of various experienced testers in a terrain appropriate to the bike category, the BIKE test also evaluates quality features such as the workmanship or the technical up-to-dateness of a bike.
Added value, such as warranty terms or scope of delivery, is also rated. The evaluation of the measurement data from our in-house test laboratory also plays an important role. There we determine the weights and acceleration values, but also the paint quality and stiffness of a bike.
In addition, we measure the geometry data and characteristics of the test bikes ourselves in order to be independent of the manufacturer's specifications and to support our practical impressions. The result is a reliable evaluation with a maximum of 250 points, which can be compared with the price of a bike. After the extensive tests in the lab and in the field, we compared the price with the performance of the best-selling bikes.
The cheapest bike from Giant scored the least points. At the same time, the most expensive candidate from Rocky Mountain managed to score very well, but not the best. Apart from individual spikes, the chart above shows that the more expensive bikes usually achieve better results.
Both in terms of points and price, the Conway lands in the midfield. Radon, Bulls and Scor cost a lot, but also deliver a strong performance. With Rocky Mountain, you have to pay a little more for a comparable result.
With Focus and Cube, the performance matches the price. Rose and Specialized offer an above-average cost/performance ratio. The best price-performance balancing act is achieved by Canyon.
Manufacturers choose different tactics to offer their customers the best possible price/performance ratio. Bargain or deceptive package? We have uncovered the levers that manufacturers use to achieve what they consider to be the best overall package.
I don't want to limit myself to just one discipline. If a bike is particularly versatile, I might only need to keep one in the garage and save money. Both the expensive Rocky Mountain and the affordable Canyon are particularly versatile. - Stefan Frey, BIKE test editor
There are parts of a bike that you simply shouldn't skimp on. Nothing influences downhill performance as positively as good suspension elements and tyres. Scor and Rocky Mountain have understood this and have put together high-performance combinations. - Peter Nilges, BIKE Test Manager
For me, the combination of a carbon frame and 120 mm fork on a hardtail has a very special appeal. With wide tyres and dropper posts, Rose and Focus are also great fun downhill. On flowing trails, I can save myself the extra cost of a race bike. - Jan Timmermann, BIKE test editor

Editor