They want to combine the characteristics of cross-country (XC) and trail bikes. In short: they want to be more downhill-fun XC bikes, but more efficient than trail bikes. The biggest differences to XC: more travel, slightly adapted geometry, thicker tyres and a shorter stem.
Downcountry is alive, only the label is dead. In the meantime, cross-country bikes have become downcountry bikes. This is good news for the customer, because for a long time XC bikes had to be ridden very precisely and hardly forgave any mistakes in rough terrain. This has changed, not least due to the increasingly wild XC World Cup routes. - Peter Denk, design engineer
No, quite the opposite. Downcountry bikes are the fun version of cross-country bikes and therefore ideal for hobby bikers. According to market analyses, this category is the future of the bike segment. Ideally, a downcountry bike should only weigh half a kilo more than an XC bike. In addition to the extra suspension travel (front and rear), the geometry should also differ. - René Krattinger, Product Manager Scott
Yes, because most cross-country bikes are now equipped with 120 millimetres of suspension travel anyway. As a result, there have been virtually no new bikes labelled as downcountry bikes in recent times. The label is obsolete. The development, on the other hand, is consistent, because everyone benefits from a plus in sovereignty with almost the same propulsion. - Peter Nilges, BIKE Test Manager

Editor