Cycling hobby vs. pro: Study shows: Hobby cyclists are more afraid than professional cyclists

The mental component in cycling is becoming increasingly important when it comes to peak performance. A recent study from 2025 has now analysed the psychological differences between elite and amateur cyclists in more detail. The research entitled "Examination of Mental Toughness, Anxiety, and Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Levels of Elite and Amateur Cyclists" provides revealing insights into the mental state of cyclists of different performance levels. The scientists analysed a total of 219 cyclists, including 124 amateurs and 95 elite cyclists aged between 15 and 41. Three central psychological variables were measured: mental strength, anxiety and worry as well as the level of generalised anxiety disorder. The results show clear differences between the performance groups and provide valuable insights into the psychological demands of cycling.

>> Insecurity when cycling: Many feel unsafe in road traffic

>> Decathlon study shows: Young Germans cycle most often in Europe

>> Bicycle service: Only 32 % use the service in the bicycle workshop - too little?

Study sees mental strength as a decisive factor

The study shows that elite cyclists have significantly higher mental strength scores than their amateur counterparts. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.05) and emphasises the importance of psychological factors for peak performance in cycling. Interestingly, although there were differences in mental strength between the genders - men tended to have higher scores - these were not statistically significant (p>0.05). This suggests that mental strength depends less on gender and more on performance level and experience. The researchers assume that the higher mental resilience in elite cyclists is developed through years of training, competition experience and possibly also through targeted psychological preparation.

Fear and worry in the performance comparison

Another remarkable result of the study concerns the cyclists' anxiety and worry levels. There was a clear difference here: amateur cyclists had significantly higher levels of anxiety and worry than the elite group (p<0.005). The researchers assume that elite riders develop better coping strategies to deal with the pressure of competition over the course of their career. The study also investigated how age affects psychological variables. Although the exact age data is not presented in detail, the results suggest that age is another factor influencing mental strength and anxiety levels alongside gender and performance level. This could have important implications for age-specific training approaches. Overall, the cyclists studied showed high levels of mental strength, while anxiety and worry levels as well as generalised anxiety disorder were in the medium range. These findings could be of great value to coaches and sports psychologists in developing customised mental training concepts.

Practical applications for training and competition

The results of this study have direct implications for training practice in cycling. As mental strength appears to be a differentiator between elite and amateur riders, targeted psychological training methods could help amateurs to improve their mental resilience. Techniques such as visualisation, mindfulness training and cognitive restructuring could be particularly helpful for amateur riders to reduce their anxiety and worry levels. For coaches, these findings mean that in addition to physical training, the psychological component should also be systematically developed in order to optimally prepare athletes for competitions.

Methodology of the study

The researchers used established psychological measurement instruments to collect the data. Mental strength was measured using the Mental Toughness Scale, while anxiety and worry were measured using the Worry and Anxiety Scale. The Generalised Anxiety Scale-7, which is based on the DSM-IV SCID-I clinical interview guide, was used to assess generalised anxiety disorders. Statistical analysis was performed using independent t-tests and ANOVA procedures, which emphasises the robustness of the results. The study included a representative sample of cyclists from across Turkey, which increases the transferability of the results to the wider cycling community.

Limitations and future research approaches

As with any scientific study, there are also limitations to this study. The cross-sectional analysis does not allow any conclusions to be drawn about causal relationships - it remains unclear whether mental strength leads to elite status or whether elite status promotes mental strength. In addition, cultural and regional factors were not considered in detail. Future research could benefit from longitudinal studies that track the development of mental strength and anxiety management over time. The influence of specific training methods on psychological variables would also be a worthwhile field of research. It would also be interesting to investigate how mental strength differs in different cycling disciplines (road, mountain bike, track). Last but not least, the question remains as to whether greater fear protects amateur cyclists better against serious falls.

Link to the study