MarathonfullyCube AMS 100 C:68 29 Race on test

Florentin Vesenbeckh

 · 22.12.2017

Marathonfully: Cube AMS 100 C:68 29 Race on testPhoto: Robert Niedring
Marathonfully: Cube AMS 100 C:68 29 Race on test
When you take a seat on the Cube AMS, you immediately realise where the journey is heading: the stretched seating position literally screams for hard climbs, plenty of watts on the pedals and a fight for seconds.

The steep seat angle also provides effective pedalling and pressure on the front wheel. With such clear race genes, it is almost a little surprising that the rear suspension responds very sensitively and absorbs small bumps diligently - the Racer radiates unimagined comfort. However, when things get rougher on the trail, the progressive rear triangle cannot deny that it only has 108 millimetres of travel available. A real race bike, after all. In technical terrain and on descents, the long 100-millimetre stem somewhat curtails the potential of the otherwise very balanced geometry. A slightly shorter cockpit would improve the handling. Racers in particular will be pleased with the remote control for the suspension elements: the fork and shock can be stiffened together from the handlebars: the front becomes almost rigid, the rear stiffens but remains active. This provides traction at the rear wheel, but also a somewhat unbalanced chassis in this mode. Marathon and touring riders will love the two-speed drivetrain: The gear ratio provides reserves for the steepest climbs. The very good rolling tyres also save power, but quickly reach their limits off-road, especially in the wet. The ready-to-ride weight of 11.6 kilos is not to be sneezed at in this price class, but the AMS does not come close to the best in class. If you're looking for a more compact bike, we recommend taking a look at the top model, the AMS 100 SLT, which Cube specifies with a total weight of just 8.9 kilos.


Florentin Vesenbeckh, BIKE test editor: For a race bike, the Cube AMS comes with surprisingly sensitive suspension, which is a pleasure even on moderate tours. Unfortunately, the lockout mode is somewhat inharmonious. For even better handling, we would fit a shorter stem, which would allow the racer to realise its full potential on technical and twisty trails.

  BIKE editor Florentin VesenbeckhPhoto: Georg Grieshaber BIKE editor Florentin Vesenbeckh  Cube AMS 100 C:68 29 Race: What looks like a complicated shock linkage is simply intended to provide a clear design.    Photo: Robert Niedring Cube AMS 100 C:68 29 Race: What looks like a complicated shock linkage is simply intended to provide a clear design.   Cube AMS 100 C:68 29 Race: The remote lever tightens the shock and fork. Unfortunately, it cannot be mounted close to the grip in this combination.Photo: Robert Niedring Cube AMS 100 C:68 29 Race: The remote lever tightens the shock and fork. Unfortunately, it cannot be mounted close to the grip in this combination.  Cube AMS 100 C:68 29 RacePhoto: BIKE Magazin Cube AMS 100 C:68 29 Race
How do you like this article?
  Cube AMS 100 C:68 29 RacePhoto: BIKE Magazin Cube AMS 100 C:68 29 Race


You can read this article or the entire issue of BIKE 9/2017 in the BIKE app (iTunes and Google Play) or buy the issue in the DK shop reorder:

Florentin Vesenbeckh has been on a mountain bike since he was ten years old. Even on his very first tour, he focussed on single trails - and even after more than 30 years in the saddle of an MTB, these are still the quintessence of biking for him. He spent his youth competing in various bike disciplines and later his cycling career was characterised by years as a riding technique coach. Professionally, the experienced test editor now focusses on e-mountainbikes. In recent years, the qualified sports scientist and trained journalist has tested over 300 bikes and more than 40 different motor systems in the laboratory and in practice.

Most read in category Bikes