MTB tyres Maxxis Rekon vs Michelin Wild Mud in test

Christian Artmann

 · 26.05.2017

MTB tyres Maxxis Rekon vs Michelin Wild Mud in testPhoto: Robert Niedring
MTB tyres Maxxis Rekon vs Michelin Wild Mud in test
When the rain pours down on the trails, the tour turns into a slog. In addition to classic mud tyres, moderately studded plus tyres now also promise that decisive extra bite in the mud.

"You won't have any fun here with those chubby tyres!" That's what a biker said to me recently on a rainy Alpine trail. "That's what you need here!" he grinned, pointing to his chunky freeride tyres.

The theory of traction, or grip, is a key factor when biking. After all, it largely determines whether you experience the trail in flow or as a "dance on raw eggs" or even have to dismount. More traction means more safety - when braking, cornering and on sloping surfaces. And that's exactly why most bikers can never get enough of it. But which tyre is the first choice on muddy surfaces? For years, classic mud tyres were the "masters of traction". Now they have competition. Thick plus tyres allow low air pressure, which promises a lot of grip due to the large contact area. Mud tyres, on the other hand, dig deep into the ground with their narrow tread and pronounced lugs. Two fundamentally different concepts. The Maxxis Rekon with its width of 2.8 inches and moderate lugs is a prime example of the young range of trail-oriented plus tyres. On the other hand, the Michelin Wild Mud represents the "narrow and aggressive" genre. The Wild Mud is characterised by its wide, high lugs and soft, grippy rubber compound. Both pairs of tyres were ridden on the same bike (Scott Spark 700 Plus Tuned) on identical wheels (inner rim width: 35 millimetres). While the testers had to inflate the mud tyres to 1.55 to 1.7 bar for puncture protection, the Plus tyres could be ridden with 1 to 1.2 bar. The test terrain included forest, root and rocky trails, as well as wet mountain meadows and muddy forest tracks.

  Mud battle practical test: Maxxis Rekon versus Michelin Wild MudPhoto: Robert Niedring Mud battle practical test: Maxxis Rekon versus Michelin Wild Mud

The practice "Wow, these tyres are really holding up!" The Plus tyres were remarkably strong in terms of traction, and not just on dry ground. Even on wet stones and slippery roots, the tyres could hardly be rattled. Even though the tread and rubber compound contribute to this, the low air pressure plays a major role. This allows the plus tyres to adapt to the ground and always generate a large contact area with the ground - and more surface area usually also means more traction. They also roll over obstacles noticeably more smoothly thanks to their inherent suspension. The mud tyres, on the other hand, are much more direct. In terms of traction potential, they are superior to the plus tyres on most surfaces - even if only just - but require a more precise line choice and driving skills. Only in really deep mud can the wet weather specialists clearly set themselves apart. On loose gravel and gravel, the plus tyres are smoother to ride. However, the ability to brake later and take corners even more aggressively comes at the price of significantly higher rolling resistance with the mud tyres. Okay for enduro racing, but not for touring or all-round use.


Our conclusion: Both tyres offer plenty of traction. The mud tyre narrowly wins the isolated traction rating, but the plus tyres come up trumps with high versatility and thus win the overall practical rating.

How do you like this article?


WHAT THE TESTERS SAY

  Christian Artmann, BIKE test author: "It's impressive how the mud tyres bite. However, thanks to their good-natured riding style and comfort, the Plus tyres are the real winners of the comparison for me."Photo: Georg Grieshaber Christian Artmann, BIKE test author: "It's impressive how the mud tyres bite. However, thanks to their good-natured riding style and comfort, the Plus tyres are the real winners of the comparison for me."  Stefan Loibl, BIKE Editor: "Especially when it gets a bit deeper, the mud tyre has the edge. But due to the high rolling resistance, I would still go for the plus tyre. After all, what's the point of having loads of grip if you can't move forwards?"Photo: Marius Maasewerd Stefan Loibl, BIKE Editor: "Especially when it gets a bit deeper, the mud tyre has the edge. But due to the high rolling resistance, I would still go for the plus tyre. After all, what's the point of having loads of grip if you can't move forwards?"  Peter Nilges, BIKE test editor: "Considering the good rolling resistance, I would have expected the Plus tyre to capitulate much earlier in the wet and in mud. It can easily keep up on roots and rocks. Really deep soils, where the tread clogs, show its limits."Photo: Georg Grieshaber Peter Nilges, BIKE test editor: "Considering the good rolling resistance, I would have expected the Plus tyre to capitulate much earlier in the wet and in mud. It can easily keep up on roots and rocks. Really deep soils, where the tread clogs, show its limits."

Wide, moderately profiled plus tyres versus more aggressive but narrow mud tyres - which pairing offers the most traction? While the plus tyres generate most of their grip through low air pressure, the mud tyres rely primarily on the interlocking of the high lugs with the ground. The difference in width is around eight millimetres.

  Tyre width measurement (58.68 cm)Photo: Robert Niedring Tyre width measurement (58.68 cm)  Measurement of tyre width (66.92 cm)Photo: Robert Niedring Measurement of tyre width (66.92 cm)


Maxxis Rekon 2.8" EXO 3C


Price 84,50 Euro
Weight 979 / 996 grammes
Construction EXO, 3C Maxx-Terra/Maxx-Speed Triple Compound, 120 TPI
Format 27,5 x 2,8"
Width 67 mm


Michelin Wild Mud 2.25" Advanced Reinforced


Price 86,95 Euro
Weight 1016 / 1005 grammes
Construction Reinforced, Magi-X Compound, 30 TPI
Format 27,5 x 2,25"
Width 59 mm

Most read in category Components