Eight all-rounders in comparison

Jörg Spaniol

 · 25.02.2007

Eight all-rounders in comparisonPhoto: Daniel Simon
Eight all-rounders in comparison
Eight cross bikes and one limit: The test ended at a maximum of 800 euros. The candidates had to prove themselves on smooth tarmac and rough trails. This revealed clear differences in character.

Over 20 years ago, the "trekking bike" saw the light of day as its own type of bicycle. It was supposed to be a universal sports bike, good on light off-road terrain and just as good on the road. A bike that combined the strengths of a mountain bike and a road bike. A bike ... for everyone. That was once the case. The term "trekking bike" now includes so many bike categories that the ancestor of the whole species was given the name "cross bike" to distinguish it from the rest of the market.


In the TREKKINGBIKE test, bikes in the price range up to 800 euros compete against each other. In this price range, noticeable compromises are unavoidable: A manufacturer who treats his bike to a good groupset no longer has the budget for a high-quality fork or hydraulic disc brakes - and if both are fitted, the frame has to be cheap. But what is important? That depends on the application. To make your decision easier, we have compared the most important components in the test.

The bikes in the test:

mybike/M3506101Photo: Daniel Simon

Bergamont Crosstec

Carver Topspeed 200

Gazelle XR-3

Ghost 5700

Marin San Anselmo

Red Bull Blackforest 2

Roba Crosslife Deluxe

Univega Terreno 500

The entire cross bike test from issue 2/2007 is available as a free PDF download.

Most read in category Bikes