10 helmets in a tough crash test

Stefan Frey

 · 19.05.2021

10 helmets in a tough crash test
10 helmets in a tough crash test

In this article, we use so-called affiliate links. With every purchase through these links, we receive a commission from the merchant. All relevant referral links are marked with . Learn more.

Thanks to new technologies, helmet manufacturers promise better protection against harmful rotational forces. But can MIPS and the like fulfil this promise? Ten MTB helmets in a crash test.

If it were up to the EN 1078 test standard for bicycle helmets, bikers would always crash head-on into an immovable obstacle in the event of a fall. However, bikers who are used to crashing know that such a head-on collision is extremely rare. According to accident statistics, bikers usually hit the ground at an angle of around 45 degrees. An angled impact causes the head to rotate abruptly - and this can be very damaging to the brain. Based on this realisation, Swedish researchers developed the MIPS system back in 2007. The promise: A thin plastic shell that can slide inside the helmet should reduce the rotational movement and thus better protect the brain.

Today, almost all well-known helmet manufacturers have models with MIPS in their range or have developed their own system that is supposed to work in a similar way. However, studies on the effectiveness of MIPS and the like have so far come almost exclusively from the marketing departments - in other words, with rather dubious credibility. As an independent testing body, the TÜV should actually develop an adequate test - but nothing has happened so far. So we developed our own helmet test rig in our laboratory, based on the latest scientific findings.

  MIPS - Scientific research shows that the brain is particularly sensitive to rotation. In the event of an angled impact, the rotational energy should be reduced by the low-friction MIPS shell (yellow) moving against the helmet. This converts rotational energy into translational energy. There are now various versions of the MIPS system that allow a relative rotation between helmet and head of ten to 15 millimetres. In our test, the probability of suffering a concussion with a helmet equipped with MIPS (according to the AIS code) was 19 per cent on average. The average probability for helmets without MIPS was significantly higher at 39 per cent. MIPS - Scientific research shows that the brain is particularly sensitive to rotation. In the event of an angled impact, the rotational energy should be reduced by the low-friction MIPS shell (yellow) moving against the helmet. This converts rotational energy into translational energy. There are now various versions of the MIPS system that allow a relative rotation between helmet and head of ten to 15 millimetres. In our test, the probability of suffering a concussion with a helmet equipped with MIPS (according to the AIS code) was 19 per cent on average. The average probability for helmets without MIPS was significantly higher at 39 per cent.

For this test, we requested ten trail helmets, three of them - because at least two of them needed to be crashed on the test bench. The ten models utilise six different technologies designed to reduce rotational forces. Five models rely on the MIPS system. The result of our impact test is astonishing: MIPS helmets have an average 50 per cent lower risk of suffering a moderate concussion in the event of a fall. Prof Lorenzl, MD, Chairman of the German Society of Neurology, considers the results of our test to be extremely significant. Even an improvement of ten per cent, says the expert, is a huge step forward from a medical point of view. However, the current helmets are also impressive when it comes to acceleration values, which are part of the standardised test: with an average of 102 g, all models are well below the permissible value of 250 g. According to the neurologist, serious brain damage can no longer be assumed in this range.

How do you like this article?

You can download the complete comparison test of the ten helmets from EMTB 1/2021 as a PDF below the article. The test costs 1.99 euros.

Why not free of charge? Because quality journalism has a price. In return, we guarantee independence and objectivity. This applies in particular to the tests in EMTB. We don't pay for them, but the opposite is the case: we charge for them, namely tens of thousands of euros every year.

Thanks to new technologies, helmet manufacturers promise better protection against harmful rotational forces. But can MIPS and the like fulfil this promise? We wanted to find out and put ten of the latest helmets to the test in our brand new test rig.

Downloads:

Stefan Frey is from Lower Bavaria and loves the mossy, loamy trails of the Bavarian Forest as much as the rugged rock of the Dolomites. For technical descents, he is prepared to tackle almost any ascent - under his own steam. As an accessories specialist, he is the first port of call for questions about equipment and add-on parts, while as head of copywriting he sweeps the language crumbs from the pages of the BIKE print editions.

Most read in category Equipment