Trek Fuel EX 8Photo: Daniel Simon
Trek Fuel EX 8
Trek's Fuel EX 8 is a sporty all-mountain bike with marathon ambitions that could be even lighter with a little tuning.

With the longest top tube in comparison (626 millimetres) and the low front end, the Fuel EX 8 has a sporty feel. The aluminium frame of the Trek also fits into the sporty concept with its slim 2545 grams. In terms of overall weight, however, it only comes in at the bottom of the rankings. Why? The chunky Bontrager tyres and the Fox fork with DRCV internals put a lot of pressure on the scales. As with the shock, Trek relies on the suspension elements developed in collaboration with Fox. The effect: the increased air volume makes it much easier to utilise the suspension travel. We also noticed this on our test ride. However, due to the sensitive rear suspension, the Fuel EX pumps noticeably when pedalling. The tyres and handling of the well-equipped Trek put it in the top three on the descents. The dropper post is not fully retractable.


Conclusion: sporty all-mountain bike with marathon ambitions that could be even lighter with a little tuning.


PLUS Balanced geometry, sensitive rear triangle
MINUS Pumps when pedalling, saddle not fully retractable, heavy wheels

  Trek DRCV stands for Dual Rate Control Valve and ensures a fully usable suspension travel thanks to the enlarged air chamber.Photo: Daniel Simon Trek DRCV stands for Dual Rate Control Valve and ensures a fully usable suspension travel thanks to the enlarged air chamber.  Compared to the rest of the field, the fork and rear suspension characteristics are extremely linear, with very easy-to-use suspension travel. Due to the enlarged air chambers on both suspension elements, the difference is also very noticeable off-road. On hard landings, however, the rear suspension in particular can bottom out more easily.Photo: BIKE Magazin Compared to the rest of the field, the fork and rear suspension characteristics are extremely linear, with very easy-to-use suspension travel. Due to the enlarged air chambers on both suspension elements, the difference is also very noticeable off-road. On hard landings, however, the rear suspension in particular can bottom out more easily.

Downloads:

Most read in category Bikes