In this article, we use so-called affiliate links. With every purchase through these links, we receive a commission from the merchant. All relevant referral links are marked with . Learn more.
The most obvious first: when it comes to system integration, there are Scott set the tone in this test. Not only is the shock protected from moisture and dust in the seat tube, but all cables run from the control centre through the headset directly into the frame. Clever details such as the specially developed SAG display (see photo) and the Syncros grips - with the option of tool integration - round off the well thought-out overall package. In the Uphill classification, the Scott ranks directly behind the trail bike competition from Canyon. Why? Unrivalled efficiency thanks to the Tracloc lever on the handlebars, plenty of traction and great climbing ability thanks to the steep seat angle. The riding position is the shortest. Downhill, the powerful Scott with its sublime front end conveys the most confidence. No descent seems too fast, no key section too steep. The good-natured suspension harmonises perfectly, responds sensitively and relieves the rider of a lot of work. However, as only second-class suspension elements without sophisticated damping control are used at this price point, they work somewhat undefined on rough terrain.
Conclusion on the Scott Genius 920 by Peter Nilges, BIKE test manager:
"The Scott is very much in line with the all-mountain concept. Uncomplicated and efficient uphill and even more uncomplicated and comfortable downhill. But a little sluggish in tame terrain."
Technical data and review of the Scott Genius 920:
Grading: The BIKE judgement is made up of the subjective impressions of the test riders and our laboratory measurements. The judgement is independent of price. Range of grades: very good (0.5-1.5), good (1.6-2.5), satisfactory (2.6-3.5), sufficient (3.6-4.5), poor (4.6-5.5).
Max Fuchs
Editor
